Chapter 5
"Gay Rights:"
A Queer and Present Danger to Our Children
|
Contents
"The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality. For the gay community to imply that boy-love is not homosexual love is ridiculous."
— Point of View. "No Place for Homo-Homophobia." San
Francisco Sentinel (a homosexual newspaper), March 26, 1992. "Facts are stubborn things, and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
— President John Adams, "Argument in Defense of the Soldiers
in the Boston Massacre Trials," December 1770. Allegations Regarding Child Sexual Abuse. If a pro-family activist even hints at a connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, homophiles will scream in outrage and immediately begin calling him every name they can think of.
This is mere distraction, because homophiles know full well the integral part child sexual molestation plays in the homosexual rights movement. They also know that if this information became widely known, it would severely damage the credibility of their movement. As you will see in this chapter, it is obvious that homophiles could not care less about the abuse of children; all that matters to them is achieving their objectives.
Most people either prefer not to think about the range of sexual activities of homosexuals, or conjure up nothing more than a vaguely sinister but very fuzzy picture in their minds.
There is ample room for stereotyping and faulty conclusions about homosexuality. However, there is one specific area in which most people have defined a surprising percentage of promiscuous homosexuals perfectly: In their wretched longing for sex with young children — the younger the better.
We must strongly stress here that the vast majority of "silent" homosexuals — the ones we never hear about — would never dream of sexually molesting children of either sex. They do not have a need to dominate and intimidate others as the homophile leaders do — they are content to live and let live. The problem lies primarily with the organized homosexuals and those who have lost control of their sexual urges.
Homophile strategists are acutely aware of widespread public revulsion towards pederasty and pedophilia, and know that they must somehow defuse the immense potential for damage to the "gay rights" movement that these perversions represent.
They often do this by alleging that 90 percent (95 percent, 97 percent, pick a number) of all child sexual molestation is committed by heterosexuals.
The purpose of this lie, of course, is to make homosexuals look like "just plain folks," with the same occasional weaknesses as the rest of us.
Definitions Regarding Child Sexual Abuse. People often equate the term "child molestation" with "pedophilia," but, in order to understand the differences between homosexual and heterosexual child molestation, a distinction must be made between the sexual abuse of pre-pubescent and adolescent minors. • In general, pederasty is the crime of sexually molesting a young person of the same sex; • Pedophilia is the crime of sexually molesting a child of the opposite sex; • Ephebophilia is a sexual attraction to pubescent or post-pubescent underage children; • A paraphilia is a disordered sexual desire for people or objects that are not usually the subject of such desires, and includes both pederasty and pedophilia; • "Pedosexual" is a term often used by pedophiles and those who support them. Homophiles often deflect criticism by simply defining homosexual pederasty out of existence. According to many "gay rights" propagandists, a 40-year-old man who sodomizes a 12-year-old boy is not engaging in homosexual activity. Therefore, they say, such a crime would be an incident of heterosexual child molestation.
Child Sexual Abuse is a Perversion. The sexual abuse of young children is a perversion, regardless of whether homosexuals or heterosexuals participate in it. The critical difference here is that child sexual molestation is a defining characteristic of the promiscuous homosexual lifestyle. As the opening quote to this chapter (made by a homosexual) asserts, sex with kids is "at the foundation of homosexuality."
Table 5-1 shows just a very few of the quotes made by homosexual activists who support the belief that pederasty is at the very heart of homosexual behavior.
Pro-family activists can copy and distribute these quotes on both sides of a standard piece of typing paper if they feel that such an action is necessary or productive. |
Table 5-1
Examples of Homosexuals and Homophiles
Recommending and Supporting Pedophilia |
|
|
"Shame on us if our lesbian/gay voices remain silent while our NAMBLA brothers are persecuted once again, and shame on those lesbians and gay men who will raise their voices to condemn NAMBLA insisting that boy lovers (and presumably the boys they love and who love them) are not part of this thing called the lesbian/gay community. ... The most I can hope for is that you will find out for yourselves who NAMBLA is and what they stand for. The lesbian/gay community should know better than to buy the garbage the straight media feeds us — especially about ourselves."
— Steve Hanson. "Shame on Us." Excerpts from a guest editorial
appearing in the Bay Area Reporter, January 23, 1992. Downloaded
from the Queer Resources Directory at http://www.qrd.org/qrd/orgs/
NAMBLA/1993/kron.vs.nambla.editorial on February 9, 2007.
|
"The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality. For the gay community to imply that boy-love is not homosexual love is ridiculous. We must not be seduced into believing misinformation from the press and the government. Child molesting does occur, but there are also positive sexual relations. And we need to support the men and the boys in those relationships."
— Point of View. "No Place for Homo-Homophobia." San Francisco
Sentinel, March 26, 1992.
|
"If it weren't for us [pedophiles], there wouldn't be a gay movement. If the leaders of the gay movement today want to turn their backs on the spirit of gay liberation, f*** them. We're speaking the truth, and the truth is that man-boy love is a central part of gay liberation, and it is a central feature of homosexuality in the West."
— Convicted child molester David Thorstad, a self-professed Marxist-
Leninist and spokesman for NAMBLA, quoted in Brent Hartinger.
"Separating the Men from the Boys: Rethinking NAMBLA and the
Future of Gay Rights." 10 Percent Magazine, September/October
1994, page 68.
|
"It's absurd to say that sex between a man and a boy isn't a gay issue. It certainly isn't a heterosexual issue."
— Pat Califia, lesbian author and activist, quoted in Brent Hartinger.
"Separating the Men from the Boys: Rethinking NAMBLA and the
Future of Gay Rights." 10 Percent Magazine, September/October
1994, page 68.
|
"In those cases where children do have sex with their homosexual elders. ... I submit that often, very often, the child desires the activity, and perhaps even solicits it, either because of a natural curiosity. ... or because he or she is homosexual and innately knows it. ... And unlike girls or women forced into rape or traumatized, most gay men have warm memories of their earliest and early sexual encounters; when we share these stories with each other, they are invariably positive ones."
— Larry Kramer, writer and founder of the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power
(ACT-UP), in Reports from the Holocaust [New York: St. Martin's Press],
1991. This quote was featured on the Web site of the North American Man-
Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) at http://www.nambla.org on April 15,
1998, and on the Queer Resources Directory at http://www.qrd.org/qrd/orgs/
NAMBLA/quotes on February 9, 2007.
|
"Boy-lovers and the lesbians who have young lovers are the only people offering a hand to help young women and men cross the difficult terrain between straight society and the gay community. They are not child molesters. The child abusers are priests, teachers, therapists, cops and parents who force their stale morality onto the young people in their custody. Instead of condemning pedophiles for their involvement with lesbian and gay youth, we should be supporting them."
— Pat Califia, lesbian author and activist, in The Advocate (a "mainstream"
homosexual magazine), October, 1980. This quote was downloaded from
the Web site of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA)
at http://www.nambla.org on April 15, 1998, under the section entitled "What
People Are Saying About NAMBLA and Man/Boy Love," and, as of February
9, 2007, was still on the Queer Resources Directory at http://www.qrd.org/qrd/
orgs/NAMBLA/quotes.
|
"I have a friend facing a possible jail sentence for having sex with a couple of 15-year-olds. I love my friend; he is a good person. At the preliminary trial, it became evident to me that the "victims" were the seducers, who had already repeatedly had sex with each other. But in the eyes of the court, their age is the sole determining factor to be weighed. ... From tea room to drag queen, I applaud every gay subculture. ... Discrimination among ourselves is profoundly self-destructive. NAMBLA deserves to be heard and respected."
— Michael Kearns. "Men Loving Boys." Los Angeles gay magazine Edge,
August 31, 1988. Downloaded from the Queer Resources Directory at
http://www.qrd.org/qrd/orgs/NAMBLA/quotes on February 9, 2007.
|
"They are sincere, concerned, loving human beings who simply have — and were probably born with — a sexual orientation that is neither understood nor accepted by most others. The condemnation and reprehension these boys and men are dealt by society are primarily the result of misinformation that has become institutionalized over time by those who are in positions to deceive and mislead public thinking and policy."
— "About the Author" (self-description by Dave Riegel, the author of the book
Understanding Loved Boys and Boylovers, published by SafeHaven
Foundation Press). This description was posted on Amazon.com, the
world's largest on-line bookseller, and was downloaded on June 2, 2000
[Note that the pedophiles are using exactly the same approach that the
homosexual strategists did: That they were "born that way," and that they
cannot help being pedophiles].
|
"If I were to see the case of a boy aged 10 or 11 who's intensely attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual, then I would not call it pathological in any way. ... When the gay rights activists began being politically active, there wasn't a sufficient body of scientific information for them to base their gay rights activism on. You don't have to have a basic body of scientific information in order to decide to work actively for a particular ideology, as long as you're prepared to be put in jail. Isn't that how social change has always taken place, really?"
— John Money, Ph.D., retired professor of medical psychology and pediatrics
at Johns Hopkins University and Hospital. Quoted in "Interview: John Money."
Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, The Netherlands, 2(7), pages 5 to 9.
|
"There is no age at which a person becomes capable of consenting to sex. The age of sexual consent is just one of many ways in which adults impose their system of control on children. ... Amazing as it may seem in this child-hating and homophobic society, boy lovers [pederasts] find boys attractive and like their spontaneity and openness."
— From a flyer by the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA),
quoted in Shirley J. O'Brien. "The Child Molester: Porn Plays a Major Role
in Life." National Federation for Decency Journal, May/June 1987, pages 9
to 11, and "NAMBLA Cancels Meeting Following NFD Protest." National
Federation for Decency Journal, November/December 1987, page 5.
|
"You look like a cherub, but you're worldly-wise.
You'd love to have me think you're newly-born,
but I can spot the twinkle in your eyes;
you know damned well how much you turn me on.
Between us, you're the satyr — I'm the saint,
so shed your sacred robe and bare your skin,
surrender to my touch without restraint,
and later, put your halo on again." — Pedophile Philip Hutchinson's poem entitled "Choirboy." NAMBLA Bulletin,
January-February 1984, page 14. |
"One thing is certain, in any cases of sexual contact between a child and an adult where there has been no force or violence, the greater the fuss and uproar the greater the possible damage to the minor.
"The major effects of such incidents are caused not by the event itself but by the outraged, angry, fearful, and shocked reactions of the adults who learn of it, whether they be parents, relatives, or police. It is these immoderate reactions which may cause whatever psychological damage occurs."
— Mary S. Calderone, M.D. (founder of the Sexuality Information and Educational
Council of the United States, or SIECUS, and a former Medical Director of the
Planned Parenthood Federation of America), and Eric Johnson. The Family
Book About Sexuality [New York: Harper and Row], 1981, page 178.
|
"Certainly it [choosing pedophilia] is responsible. ... Pedophiles can boldly and courageously affirm what they choose. They can say what they want is the best way to find love. I am also a theologian, and, as a theologian, I believe it is God's will that there be closeness and intimacy, unity of the flesh, between people. ... Pedophiles need to become more positive and make the claim that pedophilia is an acceptable expression of God's will for love and unity among human beings."
— Dr. Ralph Underwager, Lutheran pastor and founder of the Institute for
Psychological Therapies in Northfield, Minnesota, who edits a quarterly
journal Issues in Child Abuse Accusations with his wife, fellow 'sexpert'
Hollida Wakefield, quoted in Paidika, the Dutch pro-pedophilia journal,
and in Paul Likoudis. "Geoghan Case Reflects the Muck of a Deranged
Society." The Wanderer, January 24, 2002, pages 1 and 7.
|
"I guess it shows how far we've traveled from reality that people don't realize that an intergenerational sexual relationship could be and should be character building. [I am] not sure that a 7-year-old can give informed consent. That doesn't mean that one should necessarily exclude sexual relations with them."
— Wayne Dynes, Ph.D., quoted in Michael Ebert. "Pedophilia Steps Into the
Daylight." Focus on the Family Citizen, November 16, 1992, pages 6 to 8.
|
"Paedophilia is an almost non-existent kind of crime ... For instance, they use words like "child molestation." What is that? Nobody knows. "Abuse of children?" Are they talking about boxing them against the ear or hitting them with a stove pipe? Are they talking about tickling them a little? Are you talking about fondling?"
— Dr. Clarence Tripp, Alfred Kinsey's photographer, later a psychologist,
pornographer and "expert witness" on homosexuality. Interview performed
for the British Television program entitled "Secret History: Kinsey's
Paedophiles." Excerpts taken from videotaped interviews used in the
production of the documentary. Compiled by Judith Reisman, Ph.D.,
August 26, 1998 [Notice the standard tactic of trying to confuse the
issue and muddy the waters. This tactic is frequently used by homo-
sexuals and pro-abortionists as well].
|
"People seem to think that any [sexual] contact between children and adults has a bad effect on the child. I say that this can be a loving and thoughtful, responsible sexual activity."
— Wardell Pomeroy, quoted in Michael Ebert. "Pedophilia Steps Into the
Daylight." Focus on the Family Citizen, November 16, 1992, pages 6 to 8.
|
NOTE: For many more quotes by homophiles and other anti-lifers who support child sexual molestation by adults, click here. |
|
|
By vivid contrast, child molestation is not an accepted or integral part of heterosexual behavior. It is important to note that those men who molest small boys and appear to be heterosexual are generally "closeted bisexuals" or "closeted homosexuals" who may have even married, fathered children, and set up the appearance of being normal as a cover for their secret urges.
|
Why Do Homosexuals Molest Children?
(1) To Perpetrate the 'Species.' Homosexuals molest young children for two primary purposes: To continue the 'species' and, of course, for pure sexual gratification.
The first reason that homosexuals molest young boys is to carry on the perpetuation of their 'species.' Since homosexuals do not reproduce, they must recruit.
This sounds suspiciously like a slogan that "far-right homophobes" might use, but it is backed up with facts and figures.
The most effective method for homosexuals to recruit is to molest young boys. The approach used by homosexual child molesters must be subtle and deceptive. Boys who are molested when they are young and still defining their sexual identities are much more likely to "evolve" into homosexuals;• In his book Child Sexual Abuse, David Finkelhorn notes that boys victimized by adult male homosexuals were four times more likely than non-victims to engage in adult homosexual behavior themselves. This fact alone debunks the "born that way" myth. • A major survey that asked homosexuals why they were oriented towards men found that 22% said that they had been molested by older homosexuals themselves when they were children.[1] • Finally, Alfred Kinsey found in his surveys of thousands of homosexuals that the leading cause of homosexual orientation was, as he phrased it, "Early homosexual experience with adults or peers."[2] (2) For Pure Sexual Gratification. Recruitment of children into homosexuality is a sub rosa objective of the "gay rights" movement. After all, promiscuous homosexuals probably never say to themselves "I'm going to strike a blow for gays everywhere and do a little recruiting today!"
The most important reason that homosexuals molest young children is for sexual gratification.
Studies have shown repeatedly that many homosexuals relentlessly pursue young boys for sexual gratification. In the homosexual jargon, young boys are known as "chickens," homosexuals with a taste for them are called "chicken hawks," and sex with a young boy is referred to as a "chicken dinner."
The general homosexual terms for incest and pedophilia are "intergenerational love" or "pedosexuality," which often means sex between a father and his natural or adopted son.
Prevalence of the Threat to Our Children.
Overview. Most concerned and conscientious parents have no idea whatever of the magnitude of the violent sexual threat that is arrayed against their children.
So-called "gay rights" groups know very well that their most damaging enemies are the pederasts who lurk within their own ranks. If homosexual pederasts were systematically exposed to the public, the entire homosexual movement would eventually be discredited, and its carefully-cultured "victim" persona would gradually be destroyed or heavily damaged. As Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen have admitted in their book After the Ball, "Suspected child molesters will never look like victims."[3]
Whenever he is confronted with evidence of homosexual child molestation, the homophile propagandist will take on his most indignant demeanor and will strenuously insist that he and all of his "gay" friends have absolutely nothing to do with the sexual seduction of young children. He will also allege that the "gay rights" movement is doing everything it can to dissociate itself from organized pedophiles.
He will be lying through his teeth, as the following paragraphs vividly demonstrate. Not only do mainline homosexual groups casually accept child molesters, they vigorously defend them as well.
Constructing the Desired Image. In keeping with their media image as "gentle but angry people," homosexuals have teamed up with "mainline" sex education organizations to present a propaganda picture that portrays both homosexual and heterosexual child molesters as gentle and kind people who just happen to express their love in a sexual way with small children. Some of the resulting statements are simultaneously comical and absurd.
For example, Wardell Pomeroy, who was one of Alfred Kinsey's main researchers, claimed that We find many beautiful and mutually satisfying [sexual] relationships between fathers and daughters. These may be transient or ongoing, but they have no harmful effects. ... Incest between adults and younger children can also prove to be a satisfying and enriching experience. ... When there is a mutual and unselfish concern for the other person, rather than a feeling of possessiveness and a selfish concern with one's own sexual gratification, then incestuous relationships can — and do — work out well. Incest can be a satisfying, non-threatening, and even an enriching emotional experience, as I said earlier.[4] And SIECUS (the Sexuality Education and Information Council of the United States) alleges that "Most pedophiliacs (people who are sexually interested in minor children) are gentle and affectionate, and are not dangerous in the way child molesters are stereotypically considered to be."[5]
This vague and unsupported statement is in direct contradiction to established research that shows that nearly two-thirds (58%) of child molesters are violent when they assault children, and that 42% of their child victims are physically injured during the sexual abuse.[6]
"Disavowing" the Child Molesters ... It would be a grave mistake to disassociate homosexual activity from pedophilic activity. The laws that the pedophiles want could only be formulated, enacted, and enforced after society had been sufficiently numbed to the sexual activities that take place between adult homosexuals.
Individual homosexual activists will quickly and vehemently declare that NAMBLA is an outlaw group, and that they do not under any circumstances condone pederasty (defined in this instance as sex between grown men and young boys).
This assertion is purely a propaganda ploy, because the homosexual strategists recognize that NAMBLA and similar groups are their Achilles' heel. NAMBLA is routinely welcomed into high-visibility "Gay Pride" parades and other events in New York City, San Francisco, and other major cities, and, until 1994, the organization was a member in good standing of the worldwide umbrella group International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA). ILGA only expelled NAMBLA and two other pedophile groups when it began to feel too much media heat.[7]
The obvious and inescapable conclusion is that homosexual organizations heartily and proudly approve of pedophilia — except when it does not serve their political purposes.
... While Embracing Them. At a 1982 press conference, convicted child molester David Thorstad, who is a self-professed Marxist-Leninist and spokesman for NAMBLA, defended members of his group who had been arrested for pedophilia. These NAMBLA members had been convicted of kidnapping small boys and taking them to a Massachusetts cottage for molestation. Thorstad claimed that the young boys were not being molested — they were being "liberated!" He also said "I think that pederasty should be given the stamp of approval. I think it's true that boy-lovers [pederasts] are much better for children than the parents are ..."[8]
Thorstad showed us what the future holds if we relax our vigilance for just an instant when he said that "Man-boy love relationships are a happy feature of the rebellion of youth, and of its irrepressible search for self-discovery ... Most of us, given the opportunity and the assurance of safety, would no doubt choose to share our sexuality with someone under the age of consent."[9]
A Mathematical Analysis of the Frequency of Molestation. "Most sexual abusers of children are straight: True."
— Question 6 of the "Sexuality Stereotypes" quiz on the
Planned Parenthood Federation of America's Teenwire
Web site at http://www.teenwire.com/education/activity-
007-pre-posttest.pdf. The Homophile's Allegations. Because they are well aware of the threat that NAMBLA and other organized pederasts present to their movement, homosexuals incessantly claim that they are not child molesters. They also commonly allege that "97 percent of all child sexual abuse occurs at the hands of heterosexuals."
A simple mathematical analysis proves that this assertion is completely false.
The Studies Show Otherwise. A large number of studies — all performed by homosexuals or their sympathizers — have shown that an extremely large percentage of homosexuals have participated in child molestation; • Homosexual Alfred Kinsey, the preeminent sexual researcher in the field, found in 1948 that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old.[10] • A recent (2000) study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "The best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2-4% of men attracted to adults prefer men. In contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys. Thus, the rate of homosexual attraction is 6-20 times higher among pedophiles."[11] • Another 2000 study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "... all but 9 of the 48 homosexual men preferred the youngest two male age categories for sexual activity." These age categories were fifteen and twenty years old.[12] • Yet another recent study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "Pedophilia appears to have a greater than chance association with two other statistically infrequent phenomena. The first of these is homosexuality. ... Recent surveys estimate the prevalence of homosexuality, among men attracted to adults, in the neighborhood of 2%. In contrast, the prevalence of homosexuality among pedophiles may be as high as 30-40%."[13] • A 1989 study in the Journal of Sex Research noted that "... the proportion of sex offenders against male children among homosexual men is substantially larger than the proportion of sex offenders against female children among heterosexual men. ... the development of pedophilia is more closely linked with homosexuality than with heterosexuality."[14] • A study of 229 convicted child molesters published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that 86% of pedophiles described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.[15] • In a Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy article, sex researchers found that "The proportional prevalence of [male] offenders against male children in this group of 457 offenders against children was 36 percent."[16] • Homosexual activists Karla Jay and Allen Young revealed in their 1979 Gay Report that 23% of all homosexuals have acted as "chicken hawks" — that is, they have preyed on adolescent or younger boys.[17] • In a 1992 study published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, sex researchers K. Freud and R.I. Watson found that homosexual males are three times more likely than straight men to engage in pedophilia, and that the average pedophile victimizes between 20 and 150 boys before being arrested.[18] • A study by sex researchers Alan Bell and Martin Weinberg found that 25% of white homosexual men have had sex with boys sixteen years and younger.[19] Of course, homophiles occasionally present their own "authoritative" scientific attempts to deny or obscure the fact that a disproportionately high percentage of active homosexuals also molest children. However, these studies never stand scrutiny because they are invariably afflicted with one or more fatal flaws.
A typical example, often quoted by "gay rights" activists, is the July 1994 Pediatrics article by Jenny, Roesler and Poyer that finds that "Using the data from our study, the 95% confidence limits of the risk children would identify recognizably homosexual adults as the potential abuser, are from 0% to 3.1%. These limits are within current estimates of the prevalence of homosexuality in the general community."[20]
The fatal flaw of this study is that it studied sexually abused children with a mean age of just 6.1 years. Children of this young age are usually targets of true pedophiles, those persons with no sexual attraction to adults of either sex. By contrast, homosexual pedophiles are usually classified as "ephebophiles," persons sexually attracted to pubescent or post-pubescent underage children.
Surely the study managers knew this when they were doing their work, so we must conclude that they were deliberately trying to deceive with their results.
The following paragraphs calculate the actual percentage of child sexual abuse that can be attributed to homosexuals.
Now, About Those Child-Molesting Catholic Priests ... We have been inundated with media coverage of what is called the "priestly pedophilia crisis," and, as usual, the media have failed to grasp the central problem.
Even if the media moguls knew the truth, they would dare not breathe a word of it — they are simply not courageous or honest enough to say that the problem in the Catholic Church is not pedophilia, it is homosexuality. This is due to the fact that more than 80 percent of the victims were young boys.
Homophiles within and outside the Catholic Church have done everything they possibly can to divert attention away from even the possibility that there may be a higher percentage of homosexuals among the Catholic priesthood than in the general public, and that this may be the root of the problem of child sexual molestation within the Church. It is particularly the link between homosexuality and child molestation that they seek to cover up.
For example, Dignity USA kicked off its "Stop Blaming Gay Priests" campaign during the meeting of the United States Catholic Bishops Conference (USCCB) in Washington, D.C., November 10-13, 2002. The group said, "DigntyUSA [sic] is calling on the U.S. Catholic bishops to stop blaming gay priests for the clergy sexual abuse scandal. All credible evidence discounts any link between the molestation of children and homosexuality."[21]
In June 2002, the USCCB approved the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People. The Charter created a National Review Board (NRB), which commissioned a study of the sexual abuse of minors by Catholic clergy by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice of the City University of New York. This study was completed in 2004.[22]
The John Jay study defines pedophiles as people who "exhibit recurrent, intense, sexually arousing fantasies, urges or behaviors related to sexual contact with a prepubescent child over a period of at least six months duration."[23]
When people speak of the current crisis being a problem involving "pedophile priests," they are addressing only a small portion of the problem. According to the John Jay study, most of the sexually offending priests are not true pedophiles. They are instead "ephebophiles," who "exhibit these same fantasies, urges or behaviors towards post-pubescent youths."[24] Generally, the John Jay study recognized that pedophilia can be defined as the molestation of children aged ten and younger.
The National Review Board study defines "ephebophilia" as "homosexual attraction to adolescent males," a definition that certainly is validated by the quotes by "gay rights" activists earlier in this Chapter.[25]
Table 3.5.4 of the John Jay Study is reproduced below. It clearly demonstrates that, as the age of the victims rises, the percentage of victims decisively shifts from primarily female to overwhelmingly male. |
Table 3.5.4 of the John Jay Study, "Alleged Victims of
Sexual Abuse Incidents, Grouped by Gender and Age"
|
| Ages of Victims |
Gender
|
1 to 7
Years
|
8 to 10
Years
|
11 to 14
Years
|
15 to 17
Years
| Totals
(11 to 17
Years) |
|
|
Total | 487 (100%) | 1,390 (100%) | 5,016 (100%) | 3,394 (100%) | 8,410 (100%) |
Male | 203 (41.7%) | 992 (71.4%) | 4,282 (85.4%) | 2,892 (85.2%) | 7,174 (85.3%) |
Female | 284 (58.3%) | 398 (28.6%) | 734 (14.6%) | 502 (14.8%) | 1,236 (14.7%) |
|
|
Table 3.5.4 stands in stark contrast to United States Department of Health and Human Services statistics, which show that male-on-male child sexual abuse in the American general population comprises only 14.4% of all sexual abuse committed by males.[26] In other words, in the general population of males who sexually abuse minors, only one in seven molest boys. In the population of priests who sexually abused minors, six in seven molested boys.
Many experts have claimed that there is a much higher percentage of homosexuals in the priesthood than there is in the general population. Let us assume for a moment that the concentration of male homosexuals in the priesthood is four times greater than it is in the general population — about ten percent.
Using the figures given in Table 3.5.4, we find that a homosexual priest is(85.3%/10.0%)/(14.7%/90.0%) = 52
times more likely to molest a child than a heterosexual priest.
If we use the more reasonable assumption that five percent of all priests are homosexual (still about twice the average in the general population), we see that a homosexual priest is
(85.3%/5.0%)/(14.7%/95.0%) = 110
times more likely to molest a child than a heterosexual priest.
It is well known (and logical) that homosexuals with a desire for young children purposefully seek employment that will bring them into proximity with the greatest number of children possible. The most "promising" jobs of this nature include clergymen working in youth ministry, Boy Scout leaders and schoolteachers.
This is primarily why homosexual teachers have been involved in more than eighty percent of all recorded cases of teacher/pupil sex. And it explains why homosexuals are trying so very hard to force the Boy Scouts of America to accept practicing homosexuals as leaders. Most homosexuals see such acceptance as one more step toward achieving general social recognition and approval for homosexual activity, and nothing more. For homosexual child molesters, however, such recognition by the Boy Scouts would provide more ready access to children they can abuse.
A nationwide survey of school principals in 1978 showed that they received 13 times as many complaints about homosexuals sexually molesting students than they did about heterosexuals molesting students.[27]
This trend still holds true nearly thirty years later. A 2006 survey of 902 articles on teacher sexual molestation of children revealed that, of the 3,457 victims of teacher sexual described, an incredible 56 percent [1,925] fell victim to homosexual teachers [28].
If we accept the inflated figure that ten percent of the population is homosexual, this means that a homosexual teacher is((56%/0.10)/(44%/0.90)) = 11.5
times as likely to be involved in sex with a student than a "straight" teacher is. But if we use the more realistic figure of two percent of the population being homosexual, then homosexual teachers are
((56%/0.02)/(44%/0.98) = 62.4
times as likely to be involved in sex with a student than a "straight" teacher is!
Frequency of Individual Molestation. Studies confirm the above figures by showing that, even among the general class of male sexual deviants (both homosexual and heterosexual), pederasts (boy molesters) are much more prolific in their offenses than pedophiles (girl molesters).
The most extensive study performed on the relative degree of predatory behavior of these two classes of male sexual deviants found that 153 pederasts sexually molested 22,981 boys over an average period of 22 years, while 224 pedophiles molested 4,435 girls over an average period of 18 years.[29] This means that each pederast molested an average of 150 boys, and each pedophile molested an average of 20 girls — a ratio of 7.5 to one.
In light of the fact that promiscuous homosexuals have an average of 100 times more adult sexual "partners" during their lifetimes than heterosexuals, this conclusion is not at all surprising.
The Child Molestation Industry. "We believe children should begin sex at birth. It causes a lot of problems not to practice incest."
— Valida Davila of San Diego's Childhood Sensuality Circle.[30] The "Culture" is Thriving. Since child molestation is an integral part of the publicly "gay" lifestyle, it is inevitable that it would spawn a devoted following, complete with its own literature, language, and clubs.
Homosexuals have published guides that give details on where to procure young boys inexpensively in Mexico and Thailand and where to find houses of prostitution in South and Central America and Europe that are staffed entirely by boy prostitutes, most or all of whom have been kidnapped and forced into the homosexual lifestyle against their wills.[31]
In 1984, a Philadelphia homosexual bookstore began selling a book entitled How to Have Sex With Kids, which included a long section on how to entice and kidnap small children, how to have sex with them, and how to intimidate and threaten them into silence. One "how-to" passage read; It is best when beginning sex with a kid to do it as part of a game. Sometimes the kid will make the first move, sometimes the adult. Sometimes the adult can create a situation where a kid can ask for sex or start sex if they want. Curiosity is a big factor, exploring somebody and having them explore you is another good way to start. This can be a kind of show and tell. Just about anything that adults can do together an adult and a kid can do together. It's best to go slowly the first time — and it's more exciting that way too — but of course you have to be sensitive to size differences. After this book had attracted a considerable amount of unfavorable attention, the homosexual press took the position that the production and sale of such a book was protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (keep in mind that this is the same movement that seeks to crush any and all anti-"gay" speech).[32] Homophiles did not disavow the contents of the book or criticize its writers, publishers, or distributors in any way.
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Bulletin, a guide entitled "Where the Young Ones Are" listed 378 homosexual establishments in 54 major cities where child sex is marketed.[33]
Homosexual men are not the only perpetrators and enablers of child sexual abuse. Lesbian "kiddie porn queen" Kathryn Wilson was arrested in Los Angeles in 1982, while in possession of a mailing list of 30,000 men who sodomize young children.[34]
Organized Homosexual Child Abuse Groups. Believe it or not, even child molesters have unions! Organizations that openly promote pederasty operate freely and openly in the USA and other countries. The Rene Guyon Society operates out of California and "boasts" 10,000 members. Its motto is "Sex Before Eight or it's Too Late!"
Its East Coast counterpart is the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), whose membership is concentrated in eleven major Northeastern and Midwestern cities. NAMBLA bills itself as a lobbying group with a "libertarian, humanistic outlook on sexuality."[35] David Thorstad, the group's most outspoken leader, claims that he is fighting for "... the rights of children to control their own bodies."[36]
Does this sound familiar? It should, to anyone who has studied the "abortion rights" movement.
The largest British pedophile group is the Paedophilic Information Exchange (PIE), which would like to lower the age of consent to four years. Other pederast organizations include the Lewis Carroll Collector's Guild, the Childhood Sensuality Circle, the Eulenspiegel Society, and PAN.
Pedophile Techniques. Organized child molesters have taken advantage of the latest technology and information management techniques to establish a highly-organized network that poses a grave threat to our nation's children.
Child molesters in these clubs run at least 135 computer "bulletin boards" which exchange the names and descriptions of children who have been brutalized into accepting the sadistic behavior of the predators, usually due to fear of extreme physical and psychological punishment if they do not comply. The information exchanged also includes new techniques for controlling children and destroying their inhibitions and values. One of these techniques includes raping the children with symbols of authority that they respect and trust, including flagpoles (complete with American flag), and Bibles with hard corners.[37]
According to Dr. Ann Burgess of the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, as long ago as 1987 there were 275 monthly "kiddie porn" magazines in circulation, and there are certainly more now.[38]
The specialized, high-quality "molester mags" such as the Netherlands' PAIDIKA: The Journal of Paedophilia routinely include tips on luring children, such as using soap crayons in the bath to get young children to disrobe. Incidentally, the stated purpose of PAIDIKA is "to demonstrate that paedophilia has been, and remains, a legitimate and productive part of the totality of human experience."
Objectives of the Pedophiles.
Their Primary Goal. Homosexual pedophile groups such as NAMBLA and the Rene Guyon Society have as their primary objective the elimination of all laws that restrict in any manner sex between pedophiles and children of any age. This, of course, would give the sexual molesters carte blanche to commit any act on innocent children, without any restriction whatever.
Of course, the child molesters cannot possibly attain this ultimate goal in one huge leap, so they must advance one step at a time, as all amoral social revolutionaries must. This is the principle of gradualism or incrementalism which succeeded so well for the abortionists and the homosexuals, and which is now being used by the euthanasiasts.
No Fringe Elements Here! We must not dismiss pedophile groups like NAMBLA as a fringe element of the "gay rights" movement, because they represent some of the most important core values of homosexual radicals. In fact, most mainstream homosexual groups fully support the elimination of any laws restricting sexual activity between men and young boys.
For example, The National Gay Task Force (NGTF) had as one of its primary goals the removal of all age of consent laws.[39] And as far back as February 1972, the National Coalition of Gay Organizations (NCGO) demanded the "... repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent."[40] Finally the July 5, 1979 New York Post reported that New York homosexuals strongly support sex between teachers and students "as long as it occurs outside the classroom."[41]
Perhaps in the boy's room?
NAMBLA is not some far-Left nutcase group that has no clout. The organization boasts a national membership of more than 5,000, and publishes three major national periodicals, the NAMBLA Bulletin, the NAMBLA News, and the NAMBLA Journal.
In its literature, NAMBLA baldly states that "There is no age at which a person becomes capable of consenting to sex. The age of sexual consent is just one of many ways in which adults impose their system of control on children."[42]
Does all of this sound familiar? Even organized pedophiles are getting into the "victim" act, along with the radical feminists and the homosexuals!
Table 5-3 lists verbatim the philosophy and goals of the North American Man-Boy Love Association. |
Table 5-3
Official Philosophy and Goals of the
North American Man-Boy Love Association [43] |
|
|
"The North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is an organization founded in response to the extreme oppression of men and boys involved in consensual sexual and other relationships with each other. Its membership is open to all individuals sympathetic to man/boy love in particular and sexual freedom in general. NAMBLA is strongly opposed to age of consent laws and other restrictions which deny adults and youth the full enjoyment of their bodies and control over their lives. NAMBLA's goal is to end the long-standing oppression of men and boys involved in any mutually consensual relationship by;
(1) building a support network for such men and boys; (2) educating the public on the benevolent nature of man/boy love; (3) aligning [sic] with the lesbian, gay, and other movements for sexual liberation; and, (4) supporting the liberation of persons of all ages from sexual prejudice and oppression."
Social Action Agenda of NAMBLA's
"Task Force on Child-Adult Relations"
General Objective: "To improve the social status and public image of pedophiles, to eliminate the legal sanctions against pedophile behavior, and to increase public awareness of children's emotional and sexual needs by;
1. Seeking to improve the public image of pedophiles through; A. Oversight of sex-education and psychology curricula in public schools, colleges and universities, seeking to eliminate old stereotypes and falsehoods regarding pedophilia and children's sexuality. B. Consultation with authorities on mental health and human sexual behavior to encourage a humane attitude toward pedophilia. C. Legislative lobbying to reduce legal sanctions against pedophile behavior in particular and all consensual sexual behavior in general, and to increase children's rights to self-determination. D. Liaison with feminist and other groups to establish the principle that the goals of all liberation groups are essentially the same: the elimination of sexist, authoritarian regimentation of human lives; and that the liberation of children is the sine qua non [essential essence] of all human liberation. 2. Publication and dissemination of literature supporting the goals of pedophile liberation. 3. Publication and dissemination of literature to increase public awareness of children's sexual and emotional needs, especially in the light of research on cognitive development. |
|
|
The phrase "children a plus," which is common in the sexually oriented want ad section of homosexual magazines, means that the writer is seeking children (the younger the better) who have been brutalized into accepting any perverse sexual act as normal, usually to avoid severe and painful physical and/or psychological punishment.
It is curious and hypocritical that the same people who go after parents for spanking their children simply ignore the gross (and sometimes fatal) tortures inflicted upon young children by homosexuals.
An extract from the NAMBLA resolution calling for the repeal of all age of consent laws is shown below. Note the heavy use of "victim" language.
|
Extract from the NAMBLA Resolution Calling
for the Repeal of All Age of Consent Laws [44] |
|
|
"Whereas it is impossible to say at what age a person is capable of consenting to sex because every individual and every case is different; and therefore any attempt to set an age is capricious, arbitrary, and unfair; and
"Whereas any attempt to set an age would weaken NAMBLA's identity as a sexual freedom organization, and limit it to advocating the point of view of only a segment of its membership and youth; and
"Whereas the state has no business intervening in any mutually consensual relationship, and NAMBLA has correctly refrained from asking it to do so;
"Be it resolved that NAMBLA reaffirms its position of abolition of all age of consent laws and other laws that violate the freedom of young people to control their own lives." |
|
|
Access to organized pederast groups is ridiculously easy. NAMBLA publishes porn-line numbers in homosexual newspapers all over the country for the express purpose of making new contacts.
A Wide Constituency. The drive for pedophile rights is not restricted to the well-known pedophile groups, or even to the "gay rights" movement as a whole. Many other far-Left organizations push agendas that include calls for recruiting children in the public schools. These groups proclaim loudly that "homosexuals don't recruit," but a quick glance at a typical list of their demands puts the lie to this claim.
The following list of "guidelines" was composed by a homophile group that always insists that it is mainstream. The National Organization for Women (NOW) advertises in the Combined Federal Campaign and other major fundraisers that it merely works for "job equity for women" and other fuzzy, feel-good objectives. The NOW would not get a dime if its entire agenda was known to the public.
|
National Organization for Women (NOW)
Guidelines for School Promotion of
Homosexuality and Lesbianism [45] |
|
|
• School counselors should be required to take courses in human sexuality in which a comprehensive and positive view of lesbianism is presented. Lesbians as well as heterosexual counselors should be represented on the guidance staff. • The names and phone numbers of gay counseling services should be made available to all students and school psychologists. • Courses in sex education should be taught by persons who have taken the [pro-homosexual] human sexuality courses already mentioned. Students will thus be encouraged to explore alternate life styles, including lesbianism. • Textbooks which do not mention lesbianism or which refer to it as a mental disorder should not be used in sex education courses. • Lesbian Studies: Schools should set up lesbian studies programs in connection with women's studies programs to foster pride in the adolescent lesbian and to show heterosexual students that lesbians have made significant contributions to society. Learning about these contributions would foster positive feelings on the part of all students. • Libraries: School libraries should be supplied with bibliographies of lesbian literature and urged to purchase novels, stories, poetry, and nonfiction books that portray the joy of women loving women. The use of these books should be encouraged in literature and history classes. • Lesbian Clubs: Lesbian clubs should be established in the schools. Such organizations would help lesbians to develop pride in their life styles, and to help overcome the prejudice of heterosexual students and faculty. |
|
|
Defending the Child Molesters.
"Gays" to the Rescue! If the "gay rights" movement were really serious about dissociating itself from child molesters, perhaps it would not rush to the defense of pedophiles so quickly when they were caught having sex with children.
The pederast groups themselves, of course, take care of their own. The North American Man-Boy Love Association asks its members to "tithe" one percent of their annual incomes to the NAMBLA Emergency Defense Fund, which defrays the legal expenses of members who have been charged with child molestation.[46]
Perhaps the most revealing incident regarding the endorsement by "mainstream gay rights" groups of pederasty occurred when Congressman Gerry Studds was caught operating a sodomy ring out of his Washington, D.C. apartment. One major newspaper described Studds as "The avowed homosexual who was censured by the House of Representatives for having had sex with a teen-age male Congressional page. In fact, Studds had seduced the page, after giving him dinner and drinks at his apartment, and tried to seduce two others. Studds showed no remorse over his behavior."[47]
After this disgusting episode, one homosexual political action committee (PAC) poured $10,000 into Studds' reelection fund and urged voters to "reward his courage" and "help make Gerry Studds a symbol of hope for all gay men and lesbians."[48]
Hitting the Mainstream. Our society seems to have hit the bottom of the "slippery slope" in certain very critical moral and ethical areas. The United States, defender of foreign governments, can't even protect its own children from sexual predators.
Pedophilia is becoming truly mainstream.
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst now has an "Affirmative Action and Non-Discrimination Policy" that prohibits, among other things, discrimination against "persons whose sexual orientation includes minor children as the sex object."[49]
A nationally-recognized 'sexologist' has predicted that NAMBLA and its fellow molesters may soon be demanding special civil rights, just as "mainline" homosexuals are doing today; he said that "Pedophilia may be a sexual orientation rather than a sexual deviation. This raised the question as to whether pedophiles may have rights."[50]
Probably the most powerful homosexual recruiting tool of all is the plethora of comprehensive sex education courses that are being shoved down our children's throats in public schools all over the country.
Just as these programs indoctrinate our children to accept homosexual perversions, they will inevitably "progress" to asserting that "intergenerational love" is "perfectly normal."
Convicted child molester Dr. Edward Brongersma organized a foundation named after him whose purpose is "... to advance scientific research into the development of the sexual lives of children, with special emphasis upon the phenomenon of erotic and sexual relationships between children and adults."[51]
Lester Kirkendall, a co-founder of the Sexuality Information and Educational Council of the United States (SIECUS), predicts that "Sex education programs of the future will probe sexual expression with same-sex [partners] and even across generational lines. With a diminished sense of guilt, these patterns will become legitimate. The emphasis on normality and abnormality will be much diminished with these future trends."[52]
Homosexual Child Pornography. "Historically, radical feminism portrayed pornography as exploitative. Now we're saying it can be beautiful."
— San Francisco lesbian Laura Thomas.[53] Homosexual leaders like to point out that heterosexuals publish a greater variety of porn magazines than homosexuals do.
This is debatable, but, as always, their arguments are designed to distract attention away from the core issues.
It is true that both homosexuals and heterosexuals produce, distribute and view hard-core pornography. However, the primary point to remember is this: As with child sexual molestation, pornography is an integral part of the promiscuous homosexual lifestyle. It is a defining aspect of the way active homosexuals live. The consumption of hard-core porn is not typical of the average heterosexual, and any heterosexual who is obsessed with hard-core porn is a disturbed individual.
As it now stands, there is a very large market for homosexual pornography depicting sex acts between children and adults, and this market extends into heterosexual hard-core porn magazines such as Hustler, which commonly featured cartoons under the byline "Chester the Molester," drawn by homosexual Dwayne Tinsley. These cartoons depicted the torture, degradation, and murder of small children.
A typical "Chester" cartoon (Hustler, October 1977) showed a leering Chester sitting naked in an easy chair, with three frightened and bound girls of about 8-10 years old firmly in his grasp. Meanwhile, a television voice asks, "It is eleven o'clock ... do you know where your children are?"
It is amusing to note that the publishers of Hustler vehemently denied any connection between their depictions of child abuse and the commission of actual sexual crimes against children. They continued to play the victim even after 44-year old Tinsley was arrested in May of 1989 for allegedly molesting a pre-teenager for several years. Tinsley was employed by LSP Inc., the parent company of Hustler magazine.[54]
Tinsley was charged with felony incest, sodomy, child molestation, rape and oral copulation. His own 18-year old daughter testified during his trial that he molested her up to three times a day for five years.[55]
The cartoonist was convicted by a Southern California jury of five counts of child molestation. He was also convicted of three counts of "having substantial sexual contact" with the 13-year old girl whose accusations led to his arrest. According to evidence presented at his trial, Tinsley explained that "You can't write about this stuff all the time if you don't experience it."[56]
Conclusions.
There is no doubt that the "gay rights" movement is ascendent in the West today. In nation after nation, homophiles simply brush aside all opposition and enact whatever brutal or coercive laws they desire, knowing that their status as a certified victim group gives them virtual immunity from opposition — and even from criticism.
In such a one-sided atmosphere, the leaders of the "gay rights" movement often feel perfectly safe in revealing who they really are. And, as we have seen, homosexuals admit that "The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality."
If homosexuals can achieve marriage rights, adoption rights, and the power to shut down all opposition, there is no reason that they will not eventually demand sexual access to our children.
Gene Abel, et.al. "Self-Reported Sex Crimes of Nonincarcerated Paraphiliacs." Journal of Interpersonal Violence, March 1987, pages 5 to 25. A.P. Bell. "Homosexualities: Their Range and Character." Paper in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. J.K. Cole and R. Dienstbier (editors) [Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press], 1973. Paul Cameron. What Causes Homosexuality? Lincoln, Nebraska: Institute for the Scientific Study of Sexuality (ISIS), 1984. Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen. After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear & Hatred of Gays in the 90s [New York: Plume Books], 1989, pages 184 to 186. Wardell Pomeroy. "A New Look at Incest." Variations, 1977, pages 86 to 88. Robert O. Hawkins. "The Uppsala Connection: The Development of Principles Basic to Education for Sexuality." SIECUS Report, January 1980. M. Christie, W. Marshall, and R. Lanthier. "A Descriptive Study of Incarcerated Rapists and Pedophiles." Report to the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa, 1979. As described in Sheldon Travin, Harvey Bluestone, Emily Coleman, Ken Cullen, and John Melella. "Pedophilia: An Update on Theory and Practice." Psychiatric Quarterly, February 1985, pages 89 to 103. James Hitchcock. "No Dignity in This Agenda." Catholic Twin Circle, June 3, 1984, page 4. Joseph Sobran. "The Moderate Radical." Human Life Review, Summer 1983, pages 59 and 60. Richard Goldstein, "The Future of Gay Liberation: Sex on Parole." The Village Voice, August 20-26, 1980. Alfred Kinsey data described in P.H. Gebhard and A.B. Johnson. The Kinsey Data [Saunders Publishing], 1979, Table 443, "Homosexual Sample: Age at First Postpubertal Homosexual Contact," and Table 444, "Homosexual Sample: Age of Partner in First Postpubertal Homosexual Contact." Ray Blanchard, et. al. "Fraternal Birth Order and Sexual Orientation in Pedophiles." Archives of Sexual Behavior, Volume 29, Number 5, (2000), pages 463 to 478. A. Zebulon, Z.A. Silverthorne and Vernon L. Quinsey. "Sexual Partner Age Preferences of Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women." Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2000 [Volume 29, Number 1], pages 67 to 76. Ray Blanchard, et. al. "Pedophiles: Mental Retardation, Maternal Age, and Sexual Orientation." Archives of Sexual Behavior [Volume 28, Number 2], pages 111 to 127. Kurt Freund, Robin Watson and Douglas Rienzo. "Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, and Erotic Age Preference." Journal of Sex Research, February 1989 [Volume 26, Number 1], pages 107 to 117. W.D. Erickson, et. al. "Behavior Patterns of Child Molesters." 17 Archives of Sexual Behavior 77, 83 (1988). K. Freund, G. Heasman, I.G. Racansky, and G. Glancy. "Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality." Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, Fall 1984 [Volume 10, Number 3], pages 193 to 200. Homosexual activists Karla Jay and Allen Young. The Gay Report: Lesbians and Gay Men Speak Out About Sexual Experiences and Lifestyles [New York City: Summit Books], 1979, page 275. K. Freund & R.I. Watson. "The Proportions of Heterosexual and Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study." 18 34, Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, pages 34 to 43 (1992). Alan P. Bell, Martin Weinberg, et. al., Institute for Sex Research. Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women [New York City: Simon and Schuster], 1980. C. Jenny, T.A. Roesler, and K.L. Poyer, Kempe Children's Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver. "Are Children at Risk for Sexual Abuse by Homosexuals?" Pediatrics, July 1994 [Volume 94, Number 1], pages 41 to 44. Dignity USA Web site at http://www.dignityusa.org/news/021107dc-media.html, February 6, 2004. The entire John Jay Study, entitled "The Nature and Scope of the Problem of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests and Deacons in the United States," is on the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Web site at http://www.usccb.org/nrb/. John Jay College of Criminal Justice. The Nature and Scope of the Problem of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests and Deacons in the United States. April 2004, Section 3.1, "Introduction to the Problem of Child Sexual Abuse by Adult Men." Ibid. National Review Board. A Report on the Crisis in the Catholic Church in the United States. February 27, 2004, page 27, footnote 15. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children's Bureau. Child Maltreatment [annual reports, 1995 to 2001]. The complete reports are available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/publications/cmreports.htm. Note that different numbers of states reported information for different years. For the 1997 Report, Table 7-2, "Type of Maltreatment by Sex of Perpetrator." J. Dressler. "Gay Teachers: A Disesteemed Minority in an Overly Esteemed Profession." Rutgers/Camden Law Journal, 1978, 9(3), pages 399 to 445. "Survey: Male Gay Teachers Abuse Most." ReligionAndSpirituality.com, October 11, 2007. Paul Cameron. "Homosexual Molestation of Children/Sexual Interaction of Teacher and Pupil." Psychological Reports, 1985, 57, pages 1,227 to 1,236. John Leo. "Cradle-to-Grave Intimacy." Time Magazine, September 7, 1981, page 69. "Traveling in Mexico," in Bob Damron's Address Book [San Francisco: The Damron Company, 1992], page 585. John P. Hale. "Gay Rights: Where it Stands and What's to Come." Fidelity Magazine, November 1987, page 15. Gary Bullert. "Homosexuals and the Homosexual Rights Movement." American Family Association Journal, April 1990, page 14. See also the related article in the February 1990 Conservative Review. Ibid. John Leo. "A New Furor Over Pedophilia." Time Magazine, January 17, 1983, page 47. John Leo. "Cradle-to-Grave Intimacy." Time Magazine, September 7, 1981, page 69. National Federation for Decency Journal, November/December 1987, page 5. Also see Gary Bullert. "Homosexuals and the Homosexual Rights Movement." American Family Association Journal, April 1990, pages 13 to 15. Ibid. "Child Sexual Abuse Fueled By Adult Pornography." National Federation for Decency Journal, May/June 1985, page 3. National Federation for Decency Journal, November/December 1987, page 5. Also see Gary Bullert. "Homosexuals and the Homosexual Rights Movement." American Family Association Journal, April 1990, pages 13 to 15. National Federation for Decency Journal, November/December 1987, page 5. Also see Gary Bullert. "Homosexuals and the Homosexual Rights Movement." American Family Association Journal, April 1990, pages 13 to 15. Shirley J. O'Brien. "The Child Molester: Porn Plays a Major Role in Life." National Federation for Decency Journal, May/June 1987, pages 9 to 11. "Introducing the North American Man-Boy Love Association." Undated basic promotional brochure of NAMBLA National Headquarters in New York City. Reproduced in Father Enrique T. Rueda's The Homosexual Network: Private Lives & Public Policy [Old Greenwich, Connecticut; Devin Adair Publishers], 1982, page 177; Richard C. Bishop. "A Proposal for Pedophile Groups." NAMBLA Journal, New York, New York, July 1, 1979, page 5. Reproduced in Rueda, pages 214 and 215. "Motion Approved By the 7th NAMBLA General Membership Conference, Boston, December 3-4, 1983." Presented by David Thorstad. NAMBLA Bulletin, January-February 1984, page 8. Jean O'Leary and Ginny Vida. "Lesbians and the Schools." This article appeared in the New York National Organization for Women (NOW) Newsletter under the title "Struggle to End Sex Bias — Report on Sex Bias in the Public Schools." Father Enrique T. Rueda. The Homosexual Network: Private Lives & Public Policy [Old Greenwich, Connecticut; Devin Adair Publishers], 1982, page 177. "Gays Step Up Efforts." Human Events, November 3, 1984, page 8. Ibid. "Heterodoxy." The Washington Times, May 27, 1992. Also cited in "Child Molesters OK at U Mass." Family Research Report, May-June 1992, page 7. Behavior Today, December 5, 1988, page 5. The Edward Brongersma Foundation, "Statement of Objectives." Tetterodeweg I, 2051 EE Overveen, The Netherlands. Described in Judith A. Reisman and Edward W. Eichel. Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People [Lafayette, Louisiana: Huntington House Publishers], 1990, pages 20 to 23 and 40. Lester Kirkendall, co-founder of the Sexuality Information and Educational Council of the United States (SIECUS). "Sex Education in the Future." Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, Spring/Summer 1985. Eloise Salholz. "The Future of Gay America." Newsweek Magazine, March 12, 1990, page 23. "Cartoonist in Custody in Sex Case." Associated Press report in The Oregonian [Portland, Oregon], May 21, 1989, page A24. "Hustler Artist Convicted of Molesting Child." Focus on the Family Citizen, April 1990, page 5. Also see: Shirley J. O'Brien. "The Child Molester: Porn Plays a Major Role in Life." National Federation for Decency Journal, May/June 1987, pages 9 to 11. Ibid.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment